Prediction of Christopher Oconnell [] vs Hady Habib [178th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Oconnell 0 - 0 Habib
| Oconnell | Stats | Habib |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 178 |
| Highest Rank | 166 | |
| 30 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 11 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 64% (309-175) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $200,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christopher Oconnell vs Hady Habib Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Oconnell 0 - 0 Habib
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oconnell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Habib has won 50.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oconnell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Habib has won 45.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 18.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oconnell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Habib has saved 66.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oconnell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Habib winning 55.88% (W/L 38/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oconnell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Habib has played against players with an average rank of 198.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oconnell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Habib has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oconnell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Habib has converted 25.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Christopher Oconnell Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Recent Matches Available
Hady Habib Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Hugo Gaston
Player
Hady Habib
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Hady Habib
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
9
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Hady Habib
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
8
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Hady Habib
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(7) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Hady Habib
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
17
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
14 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
18
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
52 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
16%
(
14 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Clement Chidekh
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
95 of
153)
21
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
60 of
95)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
19%
(
5 of
26)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
68 of
153)
125
Total Points Won
129
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
17
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Patrick Kypson
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
79%
(
60 of
76)
22
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Oconnell vs Habib?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Oconnell Vs Habib is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | Win/Loss | 64% (309/175) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (677/439) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5804/4987) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.56 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 2961 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1351 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:17:18 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 230.96 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 61% (16381/26789) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (11955/16381) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5394/10408) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (979/2474) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 38% (10202/27134) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (299/471) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (106/180) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (85/148) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (298/269) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (298/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (186/40) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
